The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
The undisputed evidence was to the effect that the defendant, who worked for the payee and used a car in its business, traded in a wrecked car of the original payee on another car which he bought in his own name, paying the difference in cash with his own money; *Page 265 that he traded in this second car on a new Dodge sedan which is involved in the present litigation; that the amount allowed to him on the wrecked car of the company's was $125 or $150, which was the only consideration for the note. The note provided that depreciation and repairs were to be deducted on settlement of the note. It was agreed that the depreciation on the Dodge was $589, so if this amount is deducted from the amounts which under the evidence could be found to be due on the note, to wit, $125 or $150, such a credit would discharge the note. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.
Judgment affirmed. Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.
