History
  • No items yet
midpage
Taylor v. Nobles
131 Fla. 248
| Fla. | 1937
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

This cause coming on to be heard upon the briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the transcript of the record, which has been duly inspected, the Court is of the opinion that no reversible error appears and that the judgment brought before us by this writ of error should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

ELLIS, C.J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL and BROWN, J.J., concur.

BUFORD, and DAVIS, J.J., concur specially.






Concurrence Opinion

This suit is against National Surety Corporation as surety on a bond, the obligation of which is not retrospective to a date prior to May 1, 1933. The course of action, it seems to me, is found on matters not within the terms of the bond as written, therefore the Circuit Court properly sustained demurrer. Whether the principal, absent the surety, would be liable for the alleged wrongs, is a matter not before us for consideration in the present case. I concur in affirmance, with the foregoing explanation of my reason for so doing.

ELLIS, C.J., and BUFORD, J., concur.

*Page 250

Case Details

Case Name: Taylor v. Nobles
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Apr 26, 1937
Citation: 131 Fla. 248
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.