The appellant, George Buford, was informed against for the violation of Section
It is contended that the evidence adduced by the State at the trial was legally insufficient to establish a violation of Section
The judgment appealed from is reversed and a new trial awarded.
ADAMS, C.J., and TERRELL, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, HOBSON and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
SEBRING, J., not participating because of illness.
