Randell v. City of Fort Myers
153 Fla. 665
| Fla. | 1943|
Check TreatmentLead Opinion
Judgment affirmed.
BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
THOMAS J., dissents.
Dissenting Opinion
I think testimony should have been taken on the bill, and on the answer which the defendant had to present with the petition to vacate the decree pro confesso. In my opinion *Page 666
the answer could not be relied upon for the purpose of vacating the decree pro confesso and then be supplanted by a motion to dismiss. Evans v. Tucker,
