History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wolfe v. Darby
141 Fla. 713
| Fla. | 1940
|
Check Treatment

The sole question presented by the plaintiff in error is the inadequacy of the amount awarded him by the jury.

The testimony is in sharp conflict. After a study of it we have the view that the jury were well within their province in reaching the finding and that no error clearly appears.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., and BUFORD and THOMAS, J. J., concur.

*Page 714

WHITFIELD, P. J., concurs in opinion and judgment.

Justices BROWN and CHAPMAN not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Case Details

Case Name: Wolfe v. Darby
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Feb 9, 1940
Citation: 141 Fla. 713
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.