History
  • No items yet
midpage
Partin v. State Bank of St. Cloud
112 Fla. 225
| Fla. | 1933
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., and BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.






Concurrence Opinion

The final decree shows on its face that it was entered pursuant to stipulation of counsel and therefore we must assume that material facts not shown to have been proven were by stipulation admitted, — absent the contents of the stipulation appearing in the record.

Case Details

Case Name: Partin v. State Bank of St. Cloud
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Oct 2, 1933
Citation: 112 Fla. 225
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.