History
  • No items yet
midpage
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Urolia
109 Fla. 384
| Fla. | 1933
|
Check Treatment

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court now being advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed. F. E. C. Ry. Co. v. Carter, 67 Fla. 335, 65 Sou. Rep. 254.

Affirmed.

DAVIS, C. J., and TERRELL, and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Urolia
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Apr 10, 1933
Citation: 109 Fla. 384
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.