History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davis v. Fleming
103 Fla. 1156
| Fla. | 1932
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. *Page 1157

BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS AND TERRELL, J.J., concur.

BROWN, J., dissents.






Concurrence Opinion

The evidence in this case is perhaps the weakest that could be imagined on the question of the agency of defendant's son to bind his father for the work which was done on the father's place, but I concur on the ground that the presumption in favor of the jury' verdict, approved by the trial court, has not been overthrown. McKinnon vs. Lewis, 60 Fla. 125, 53 So. 940. Phoenix Ins. Co. vs. Bryan, 58 Fla. 341, 50 So.2d 576.

It may be added that the result also seems to be just.

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. Fleming
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jan 7, 1932
Citation: 103 Fla. 1156
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.