History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harkavy v. Harkavy
144 Fla. 108
| Fla. | 1940
|
Check Treatment

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice WHITFIELD and Mr. Justice CHAPMAN are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be reversed while Mr. Justice BROWN, Mr. Justice BUFORD and Mr. Justice THOMAS are of the opinion that the said decree should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of Stateex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., WHITFIELD, BROWN, BUFORD, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, J. J., concur. *Page 110

Case Details

Case Name: Harkavy v. Harkavy
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jul 26, 1940
Citation: 144 Fla. 108
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.