History
  • No items yet
midpage
Huzzen v. Huzzen
154 Fla. 651
| Fla. | 1944
|
Check Treatment

Appeal is from final decree denying divorce, directing the custody of a minor child and decreeing separate maintenance for the wife and minor child on bill of complaint, answer incorporating counter claim and testimony taken.

No useful purpose can be served by setting forth the evidence which is conflicting. We construe the decree as one for separate maintenance.

Appellant has failed to carry the burden of clearly showing that reversible error has occurred and as such is not apparent from the record, the decree is affirmed.

So ordered.

BUFORD, C. J., BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Huzzen v. Huzzen
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jun 27, 1944
Citation: 154 Fla. 651
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.