History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dickson v. Humpfer
111 Fla. 581
| Fla. | 1933
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD and BUFORD, J. J., concur.






Concurrence Opinion

When suing upon a promissory note, upon its face barred by the statute of limitations, but as which the defendant, before the bar of the statute became complete, made a part payment of principal or interest, the plaintiff may declare upon the original note as the real cause of action. Vinson v. Palmer, 45 Fla. 631, 34 Sou. Rep. 276. I therefore concur in the per curiam order of affirmance prepared by Division B of this Court. *Page 582

Case Details

Case Name: Dickson v. Humpfer
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jul 28, 1933
Citation: 111 Fla. 581
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.