History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tunnicliffe, Liquidator v. Cudahy Packing Co.
110 Fla. 323
| Fla. | 1933
|
Check Treatment

In this cause Mr. Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed, while Mr. Chief Justice DAVIS, Mr. Justice WHITFIELD and Mr. Justice ELLIS are of the opinion that the said decree should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of Stateex rel Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So.2d R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur. *Page 324

Case Details

Case Name: Tunnicliffe, Liquidator v. Cudahy Packing Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: May 25, 1933
Citation: 110 Fla. 323
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.