History
  • No items yet
midpage
First National Bank of Chipley v. Chipley
120 So. 323
| Fla. | 1929
|
Check Treatment

Writ of error in this cause is taken from a judgment against plaintiff in error in favor of defendant in error. The sole question presented here is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment. The record has been examined and it is not made to appear *Page 269 that the jury misinterpreted the weight of the evidence or that it was influenced by considerations outside the evidence. The question at issue was peculiarly within the province of the jury to determine. In such a situation the judgment below must be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: First National Bank of Chipley v. Chipley
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Feb 22, 1929
Citation: 120 So. 323
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.