32:T48f,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Brenner v. McNeill, 105 Fla. 541","datePublished":"1932-05-20","legislationDate":"1932-05-20","citation":"Brenner v. McNeill, 105 Fla. 541 (Fla. 1932)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Supreme Court of Florida","description":"Read the full text of Brenner v. McNeill (Brenner v. McNeill, 105 Fla. 541 (Fla. 1932)). This legal opinion, filed in 1932-05-20, from the Supreme Court of Florida discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/brenner-v-mcneill--3387728"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/brenner-v-mcneill--3387728","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Brenner v. McNeill, Supreme Court of Florida, Brenner v. McNeill, 105 Fla. 541 (Fla. 1932)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T509, Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted to the Court upoh the transcript of the record of the final decree herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no reversible error in the said decree. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Warren v. Creevey, 87 Fla. 46, 52, 99 So. 247, 249; Adams v. Essex, 1 Bibb (Ky.) 149, 4 Am. Dec. 623; Trustees of I. I. Fund v. Lewis, 34 Fla. 424, 16 So. 325; Taylor v. Am. National Bank, 63 Fla. 631, 57 So. 678; 3 R. C. L. 1272, section 502; Owings Lumber Co. vs. Marlowe, 200 Ala. 568, 76 So. 926; L. R. A. 1918-E, 180 et seq.; Sections 4499 and 5744 C. G. L., Scott vs. Taylor, 63 Fla. 612, 58 So. 30; McClure v. American Nat’l Bank, 67 Fla. 32, 64 So. 427; 8 C. J. 127, 342, 344, 478, 41 C. J. 507-509, 662, 693-4.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.