History
  • No items yet
midpage
First Trust & Savings Bank v. William J. Cozens Realty Co.
113 Fla. 83
| Fla. | 1933
|
Check Treatment

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See Schnorr v. Wright, 136 So. 510.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD and BUFORD, J. J., concur. *Page 84

Case Details

Case Name: First Trust & Savings Bank v. William J. Cozens Realty Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Dec 1, 1933
Citation: 113 Fla. 83
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.