Ms. Noreen S. Dreyer County Attorney Martin County 2401 Southeast Monterey Road Stuart, Florida 34996
Dear Ms. Dreyer:
You have asked substantially the following:
Do the provisions of s. 116.111, F.S., Florida's Antinepotism Law, apply to the appointment of an individual to an unpaid position on an advisory board?
In sum, it is my opinion:
The provisions of s. 116.111, F.S., operate to prohibit the appointment of a relative to a position on an advisory board, regardless of whether the position is compensated.
This office has been advised that a county commissioner wishes to appoint her spouse to an advisory board created by the county to assist the county commission in carrying out its governmental functions. While the members of the advisory board are not paid, they are reimbursed for their expenses.
Section 116.111, F.S., the Antinepotism Law, prohibits "public officials"1 from appointing or employing relatives2 to positions in agencies3 over which they have supervision or control. In pertinent part, s. 116.111(2)(a), F.S., provides
[a] public official may not appoint, employ, promote, or advance, or advocate for appointment, employment, promotion, or advancement, in or to a position in the agency in which he is serving or over which he exercises jurisdiction or control any individual who is a relative of the public official. . . . (e.s.)
I have not found, nor have you provided, any judicial decision which has considered whether the prohibitions and limitations contained in s. 116.111, F.S., apply to appointments to advisory boards. Section 116.111, F.S., contains no exception for boards, advisory or otherwise.4
In AGO 73-347, however, this office concluded that s. 116.111, F.S., would prohibit the appointment by a sheriff of a relative to the position of deputy sheriff even if the relative served without compensation. It was determined that the statutory language of s. 116.111, F.S., clearly prohibits any public officer from appointing or employing to any position in an agency over which the official exercises control any individual who is a relative of the appointing officer. The opinion states that "[t]he language of the statute covers all positions within the affected agency, paid as well as unpaid, and legislative purposes must be followed by the inclusion of unpaid as well as paid appointments within the statutory prohibition." (e.s.)
The language in s. 116.111, F.S., has not been amended in a manner such that the conclusion reached in AGO 73-347 would be changed.
Section 116.111, F.S., should be construed in light of its obvious intent to discourage nepotism by public officials in the appointment or employment of persons in public positions.5
Accordingly, s. 116.111, F.S., would prohibit the appointment by a county commissioner of a relative to an unpaid position on a governmental advisory board created by the county to assist the county commission in carrying out its governmental functions.
Sincerely,
Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General
(ls)
