The sublease dated July 26, 1988 by its terms commenced on July 1, 1988 and was to coincide with the term of the primary lease between the sublessor herein and the lessor therein, Bedford Properties, Inc.
The sublease by its express terms was made subject to the terms of the primary or basic lease.
Section two(b) of the sublease required the sublessee to post the sum of $6,635.40 as security for the faithful performance of the terms of the sublease. This sum was posted by the plaintiff.
The sublease terminated in February 1991. Thereafter, the plaintiff moved to another location in the same shopping center and is presently occupying those premises. The plaintiff posted a second security deposit of $3,000.00 with the landlord. It is not clear whether the lease for the new location is a new lease or merely a renewal of the old lease between the plaintiff and the defendant herein. It would appear from the fact CT Page 13550 that that plaintiff was required to post a security of $3,000.00 that this was a new lease and that the old lease had expired in February 1991.
The only defense set forth by the sublessor is the Statute of Limitations alleging that §
The writ summons and complaint herein is dated May 5, 1998 with a return date of June 6, 1998. In hand service was made upon the defendant on June 2, 1998.
"Section
When the original sublease expired and the sublessee was asked to move to an adjacent location whatever lease was entered into was for a different premises and caused the expiration of the old lease as far as the defendant herein was concerned. It was at this time that the cause of action accrued. Since more than six years have expired since that time, i.e., February 1991, the plaintiff is thus barred from bringing this action.
Judgment may enter for the defendant.
The Court
By Curran, J.
