History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mead v. Harbor Park Associates, No. Cv97 0158043 S (Oct. 16, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 12884
| Conn. Super. Ct. | 2000
|
Check Treatment

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Since Connecticut pursues a liberal policy in allowing amendments;Johnson v. Toscano, 144 Conn. 582, 587, 136 A.2d 341 (1957); and this court has broad discretion in deciding whether to allow an amendment to the pleadings; Connecticut National Bank v. Voog, 233 Conn. 352, 364,658 A.2d 172 (1995), the plaintiff's request for leave to amend is hereby granted and the defendant's objection is hereby overruled because the plaintiff has not alleged a new cause of action. See Zorick v. Schwartz, Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford at Hartford, Docket No. 565814 (July 19, 1999, Mulcahy, J.) (25 Conn.L.Rptr. 146). CT Page 12885

RICHARD J. TOBIN, JUDGE.

Case Details

Case Name: Mead v. Harbor Park Associates, No. Cv97 0158043 S (Oct. 16, 2000)
Court Name: Connecticut Superior Court
Date Published: Oct 16, 2000
Citation: 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 12884
Docket Number: No. CV97 0158043 S
Court Abbreviation: Conn. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.