[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER (#103) After hearing held on defendant Alfred Ayotte, Jr.'s motion to dismiss, it is hereby ORDERED:

The plaintiffs have amended their complaint (#102) to correct a defect in the return date. Such amendment is permissible; 52-72(a), Conn. Gen. Stat.; and, when made, will withstand an attack by dismissal motion. Brandriff v. Sellas, 40 Conn. Super. Ct. 243 (1985).

The motion to dismiss is denied.

GAFFNEY, J. CT Page 5040