History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jarrar v. New Canaan Glass Mirror, No. Cv00-0372441 (Jan. 18, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 1296
| Conn. Super. Ct. | 2001
|
Check Treatment

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO STRIKE DATED AUGUST 3, 2000 (#112)
The defendant may not apportion liability pursuant to General Statutes § 52-102b in a products liability case even though the allegations of the apportionment complaint sound in negligence. See Allard v. LibertyOil Equipment Co., 253 Conn. 787, 799, 756 A.2d 237 (2000). Accordingly, the apportionment defendant's motion to strike is granted.

Further, because the apportionment defendant is no longer part of the case, the plaintiff's amended complaint as it pertains to the apportioned defendant, Kawneer Company, is invalid. If the plaintiff wished to bring the Kawneer Company into the case, it must serve the company properly.

John W. Moran, Judge

Case Details

Case Name: Jarrar v. New Canaan Glass Mirror, No. Cv00-0372441 (Jan. 18, 2001)
Court Name: Connecticut Superior Court
Date Published: Jan 18, 2001
Citation: 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 1296
Docket Number: No. CV00-0372441
Court Abbreviation: Conn. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.