In accordance with Connecticut General Statutes
On March 15, 1993, plaintiff served upon defendant a second pretermination letter advising defendant of her failure to pay rent due and plaintiff's intention of terminating her lease. Defendant made no response to either notice.
The above notices can be equated with a grievance procedure.
Defendant in effect asks the court to find that Connecticut's summary process statutes are unconstitutional with respect to tenants in state subsidized housing unless a pre-suit grievance procedure is available.
The right to due process does not require two hearings and as long as a full judicial hearing is conducted prior to the threatened deprivation the Federal Constitution has not been offended. Housing Authority v. McKenzie,
The defendant's motion to dismiss is denied.
Austin, J. CT Page 6092
