History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Vasel
190 A.2d 74
Conn. Super. Ct.
1963
Check Treatment

The defendant was found guilty of operating an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (General Statutes § 14-227) and has appealed from the judgment rendered, assigning as error that he was not, upon all the evidence, guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the judgment was contrary to law and against the evidence. *Page 320

There was no request for a finding of facts and no finding was made. See Cir. Ct. Rule 7.31.1. A transcript of the evidence was presented for the purpose of this appeal.

The defendant did not file a brief in accordance with Circuit Court Rule 7.45.1. No claim of error, not presented in a written brief duly filed, need be considered. Cir. Ct. Rule 7.47.3. The defendant having failed to file a brief, the appeal is dismissed.

There is no error.

KINMONTH, DEARINGTON and JACOBS, JS., participated in this decision.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Vasel
Court Name: Connecticut Superior Court
Date Published: Feb 28, 1963
Citation: 190 A.2d 74
Docket Number: File No. MV 16-3886
Court Abbreviation: Conn. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.