History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Vasel
190 A.2d 74
| Conn. Super. Ct. | 1963
|
Check Treatment

The defendant was found guilty of operating an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (General Statutes § 14-227) and has appealed from the judgment rendered, assigning as error that he was not, upon all the evidence, guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the judgment was contrary to law and against the evidence. *Page 320

There was no request for a finding of facts and no finding was made. See Cir. Ct. Rule 7.31.1. A transcript of the evidence was presented for the purpose of this appeal.

The defendant did not file a brief in accordance with Circuit Court Rule 7.45.1. No claim of error, not presented in a written brief duly filed, need be considered. Cir. Ct. Rule 7.47.3. The defendant having failed to file a brief, the appeal is dismissed.

There is no error.

KINMONTH, DEARINGTON and JACOBS, JS., participated in this decision.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Vasel
Court Name: Connecticut Superior Court
Date Published: Feb 28, 1963
Citation: 190 A.2d 74
Docket Number: File No. MV 16-3886
Court Abbreviation: Conn. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.