This Court denied the fund's motion to intervene without memorandum on April 8, 1991.
Oral argument was again heard on these motions on May 6, 1991 when the fund and the plaintiff were represented by counsel.
The Court, having reconsidered, will deny the fund's motion to intervene for the reason that, in this case, it is not alleged that the fund has either paid or become obligated by an award to pay any worker's compensation payments which is a statutory condition precedent to the right to intervene given in Section
Further, Section
The motion for stay is denied.
LEUBA, JUDGE
