Venkat v. Venkat, No. Fa 00 0178014 S (May 15, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 6254
| Conn. Super. Ct. | 2002|
Check TreatmentThe assertion in the plaintiff's motion that the court used targeted earnings to form the reduced order is not found in the court's ruling. The court did reference testimony that
". . . . that the plaintiff's income has been impacted adversely since April with slightly under 20 percent reduction."
The motion is denied.
HARRIGAN, J.T.R. CT Page 6255
