History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sirotenko v. Administrator, Uca, No. Cv02 039 18 27 (Jan. 31, 2003)
2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 1652
| Conn. Super. Ct. | 2003
|
Check Treatment

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
The court has reviewed the record certified to it by the Board of Review, the defendant's memorandum of law, the plaintiff's pleadings and has considered all of her submissions despite her failure to attend the hearing held on January 30, 2003. The decision of the Board of Review follows reasonably from the facts found and correctly applies the law to those facts. The decision is not arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law. The decision is affirmed.

The appeal is dismissed.

BY THE COURT,

BALLEN, J.T.R. CT Page 1653

Case Details

Case Name: Sirotenko v. Administrator, Uca, No. Cv02 039 18 27 (Jan. 31, 2003)
Court Name: Connecticut Superior Court
Date Published: Jan 31, 2003
Citation: 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 1652
Docket Number: No. CV02 039 18 27
Court Abbreviation: Conn. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.