History
  • No items yet
midpage
Blondin v. Connecticut Company
91 Conn. 735
| Conn. | 1917
|
Check Treatment

The above-entitled actions were tried together upon the same evidence, and a verdict in each case was directed for the defendant. We think the record shows that there was evidence upon which the cases should have been submitted to the jury.

There is error and a new trial is ordered in each case.

Case Details

Case Name: Blondin v. Connecticut Company
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Jan 25, 1917
Citation: 91 Conn. 735
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.