History
  • No items yet
midpage
Grolock v. Haefenfeldtz
99 Conn. 732
| Conn. | 1923
|
Check Treatment

The errors assigned are all predicated upon corrections of the finding. We have duly considered the evidence and cannot hold that the court found facts or failed to find facts, essential to the judgment, incorrectly. The conclusions of the trial court could have been reasonably reached upon the evidence and the inferences drawn from it.

There is no error.

Case Details

Case Name: Grolock v. Haefenfeldtz
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Nov 7, 1923
Citation: 99 Conn. 732
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.