History
  • No items yet
midpage
Noyes v. University Realty, Inc.
1 Conn. App. 453
| Conn. App. Ct. | 1984
|
Check Treatment

The appellant did not appear to argue this appeal on the date the case was assigned for hearing. Subsequently, a motion to reargue was denied by the court because we were not persuaded that the reasons given for the appellant's absence warranted reargument.

Furthermore, a review of the record and briefs indicates that there was no error.

There is no error.

Case Details

Case Name: Noyes v. University Realty, Inc.
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Feb 8, 1984
Citation: 1 Conn. App. 453
Docket Number: (2282)
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.