History
  • No items yet
midpage
Onofrey v. Resnik
100 Conn. 748
| Conn. | 1924
|
Check Treatment

The evidence was conflicting and hence the determination by the jury of the issue of negligence and contributory negligence in favor of the defendants must stand unless we can say as matter of law that the jury's conclusions were such that reasoning minds could not reasonably have reached them. We are clearly of the opinion that we would not be justified in so holding as matter of law.

There is no error.

Case Details

Case Name: Onofrey v. Resnik
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: May 8, 1924
Citation: 100 Conn. 748
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.