History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pellegrino Di Leo v. Filippo Catanzaro
115 A. 925
| Conn. | 1921
|
Check Treatment

Examination of the evidence shows that the motion to correct the finding is almost in its entirety wholly without merit; the rest of the motion is without significance and, if granted, could not affect the questions of law involved in the appeal. Unless the finding be corrected the claimed errors of law, as the appellant concedes, cannot be successfully pursued.

There is no error.

Case Details

Case Name: Pellegrino Di Leo v. Filippo Catanzaro
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Nov 30, 1921
Citation: 115 A. 925
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.