History
  • No items yet
midpage
Levine v. Hegeman Transfer & Lighterage Terminal, Inc.
100 Conn. 122
| Conn. | 1923
|
Check Treatment

This case was tried with the companion case of Samuel Kaufman against the same defendants. The matters discussed in that case are equally applicable here, with a single exception. The prohibition of recovery for failure to have a motor-vehicle registered is limited to the owner of the vehicle by the provisions of Chapter 400, § 61, of the Public *Page 123 Acts of 1921. Prior to the Act of 1917, the same prohibition applied equally to the operator of the motor-vehicle and the passenger in the motor-vehicle. The present statute does not bar the plaintiff passenger from recovery for the failure of Kaufman, the owner of the motor-vehicle, to have had it registered. Shea v. Corbett, 97 Conn. 141, 147, 115 A. 694.

There is no error.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Levine v. Hegeman Transfer & Lighterage Terminal, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Dec 13, 1923
Citation: 100 Conn. 122
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.