History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bona v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
88 Conn. 731
| Conn. | 1914
|
Check Treatment

The court directed a verdict for the defendant upon the ground that no sufficient evidence had been presented either of negligence on the part of the defendant or of the lack of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. An examination of the testimony satisfies us that the court was correct in this conclusion, at least in so far as contributory negligence is concerned. The jury could not from the evidence reasonably have concluded that the plaintiff was in the exercise of due care.

There is no error.

Case Details

Case Name: Bona v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Jun 10, 1914
Citation: 88 Conn. 731
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.