History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pentino v. Tedesco
104 Conn. 747
| Conn. | 1926
|
Check Treatment

Reasons of appeal based upon exceptions to the finding are not well taken. The only other reason of appeal requiring consideration is the overruling of defendants' claim of law four, "that the plaintiff did not procure a customer who was ready, willing and able to buy the defendants' said property." Assuming that this reason of appeal is intended to claim that the subordinate facts do not support this conclusion, we are of opinion that the finding as amended does not support this conclusion.

There is error and a new trial is ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: Pentino v. Tedesco
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Jul 30, 1926
Citation: 104 Conn. 747
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.