History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cornic v. Stewart
176 P. 164
| Cal. | 1918
|
Check Treatment

In this case no respondent's brief has been filed, but a cursory examination of the record discloses that the only appear before us is an attempted appeal from two orders of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff's first amended complaint and denying the plaintiff's application for leave to file a second amended complaint. Neither of these orders are appealable orders and there is no appeal from the judgment. It follows that the appeals must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Sloss, J., and Victor E. Shaw, J., pro tem., concurred.

*Page 243

Case Details

Case Name: Cornic v. Stewart
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 12, 1918
Citation: 176 P. 164
Docket Number: L. A. No. 4567.
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.