History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chiapella v. County Nat. Bank Etc. Co.
217 Cal. 503
| Cal. | 1933
|
Check Treatment

THE COURT.

The lower court dismissed this cause for want of jurisdiction.

[1] A suit upon a rejected claim is not an exercise of probate jurisdiction. The action is upon the contract and venue is determined as in other civil cases. (McLean v. Crow,88 Cal. 644, 647 [26 P. 596]; Gallagher v. McGraw, 132 Cal. 601 [26 P. 596].) Such a suit is also recognized as a transitory action. It follows the person of the defendant and may be tried in a county other than that wherein the estate is being probated. (Thompson v. Wood, 115 Cal. 301 [64 P. 1080].)

The order is affirmed.

*Page 504

Case Details

Case Name: Chiapella v. County Nat. Bank Etc. Co.
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 7, 1933
Citation: 217 Cal. 503
Docket Number: Docket No. L.A. 13891.
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.