Matter of Vaughan
202 Cal. 792
| Cal. | 1928|
Check Treatment[1] The moving parties and the appellant concede that, if it be held by this court, in disposing of the other motions to dismiss, that Edna Vaughan Daniels is not a party aggrieved by the judgment and decree denying the petition to revoke the probate of the will entered April 12, 1927, this appeal *Page 793
should be dismissed. The court has so decided. (Estate ofVaughan, ante, p. 672 [
The appeal is dismissed.
Richards, J., Shenk, J., Seawell, J., Langdon, J., Preston, J., and Curtis, J., concurred.
