History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Louis M. Darensbourg
524 F.2d 233
| 5th Cir. | 1975
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

GEE, Circuit Judge:

In his petition for rehearing, defendant-appellee points out a factual inaccuracy in the preamble to our opinion. The fourth sentence in the opinion is therefore corrected to read as follows:

A search by authority of the warrant produced weapons, though not precisely those named in the warrant, including a sawed-off shotgun (of smaller gauge than that stated) allegedly used in the armed robbery of a drive-in grocery.

In all other respects, the Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.






Dissenting Opinion

GODBOLD, Circuit Judge

(dissenting):

For the reasons set out in my dissenting opinion, I dissent from the denial of petition for rehearing.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Louis M. Darensbourg
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 4, 1975
Citation: 524 F.2d 233
Docket Number: 74-2313
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.