History
  • No items yet
midpage
Workman v. Kingsbury
206 Cal. 793
| Cal. | 1928
|
Check Treatment

THE COURT.

[1] For the reason assigned and upon the grounds stated in our opinion this day filed, in which *Page 794 we considered together cases S.F. Nos. 12707 to 12766, both inclusive, ante, p. 148 [273 P. 797], the application of Charles M. Workman for a writ of mandamus commanding the surveyor-general of the state of California and ex-officio register of the state land office to issue to him a permit to prospect for oil and gas upon the lands described in his said petition, wherein said lands are included within the boundaries of lands described in the respective petitions of Boone and Shudde, as therein considered, is denied and the petition is dismissed.

Rehearing denied.

Shenk, J., and Curtis, J., voted for a rehearing.

Case Details

Case Name: Workman v. Kingsbury
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 31, 1928
Citation: 206 Cal. 793
Docket Number: Docket No. S.F. 12728.
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.