History
  • No items yet
midpage
Takata v. Riley
1931 Cal. LEXIS 397
| Cal. | 1931
|
Check Treatment

THE COURT.

At the close of oral argument the chief justice announced the decision of the court as follows:

[1] The question involved is not new. We have examined it a great many times. On the authority of Estate of Wellings,192 Cal. 506, 519 [221 P. 628], Heron v. Riley, 209 Cal. 507 [289 P. 160], Frank v. Maguire, 201 Cal. 414 [257 P. 515], Buelke v. Levenstadt, 190 Cal. 684 [214 P. 42], and cases referred to therein, we are of the view that the title of this act is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Constitution. The writ will issue.

Case Details

Case Name: Takata v. Riley
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 8, 1931
Citation: 1931 Cal. LEXIS 397
Docket Number: Docket No. S.F. 14424.
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.