History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holcomb v. Breitkreutz
179 P. 162
| Cal. | 1919
|
Check Treatment

Plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant for $825 for assault and battery. Defendant appeals.

[1] Appellant's first point is thus stated: "While the defendant fully realizes that ordinarily appellate courts will not interfere with a judgment or verdict where the testimony in the case is conflicting, yet it would appear to appellant that the record in this case discloses that the preponderance of evidence was in his favor." Counsel thus correctly states the rule, that this court will not interfere with the verdict where the testimony is conflicting. The second point is that the verdict is excessive. Plaintiff claimed five thousand dollars punitive and five thousand dollars actual damages. The damages were not excessive. The appeal is frivolous.

Judgment is affirmed, with one hundred dollars damages to the plaintiff for a frivolous appeal.

Lennon, J., and Melvin, J., concurred.

*Page 18

Case Details

Case Name: Holcomb v. Breitkreutz
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 25, 1919
Citation: 179 P. 162
Docket Number: L. A. No. 4698.
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.