Mandamus to compel auditing and payment of a claim of plaintiff against the city of Madera. The superior court gave judgment for defendants, and on appeal by plaintiff to the district court of appeal of the third appellate district the justices of that court were unable to agree upon a judgment. The appeal was therefore transferred to this court for determination.
In all material aspects the case here presented is the same as that of Arthur v. City of Petaluma, ante, p. 216, [
The decision in Arthur v. Petaluma, ante, p. 216, [
The judgment is affirmed.
Shaw, J., Sloss, J., Melvin, J., Henshaw, J., and Victor E. Shaw, J., pro tem., concurred.
