History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pacific Orient v. Sup. Ct. of City Cty. of San Fran.
203 Cal. 797
| Cal. | 1928
|
Check Treatment

MEMORANDUM CASE.
THE COURT.

[1] Application for a writ of prohibition directing the respondent Superior Court to desist from further proceedings in an action brought to compel the petitioner here to submit a dispute or controversy to arbitration pursuant to the terms of the contract entered into before the present law on arbitration became effective. (Code Civ. Proc., secs. 1280 et seq., Stats. 1927, page 404.) The petition is denied on the authority of Inthe Matter of the Application of Berkovitz v. Arbib Houlberg, 230 N.Y. 261 [130 N.E. 288]; Red Cross Line v.Atlantic Fruit Co., 264 U.S. 109 [68 L.Ed. 582, 44 Sup. Ct. Rep. 174]. (All concur.)

Rehearing denied.

All the Justices concurred.

*Page 1

Case Details

Case Name: Pacific Orient v. Sup. Ct. of City Cty. of San Fran.
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 16, 1928
Citation: 203 Cal. 797
Docket Number: Docket No. S.F. 12825.
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.