History
  • No items yet
midpage
Esaisa v. Superior Court of Sonoma County
207 Cal. 796
| Cal. | 1929
|
Check Treatment

THE COURT.

This matter comes to us upon a petition for a writ of review to determine the legality of the findings and judgment and other proceedings leading up to the formation of the proposed Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District, which matter has been determined by the *Page 797 defendant Superior Court contrary to the contentions of petitioner. [1] The questions raised have all been disposed of in a case from the county of Napa, California, involving precisely the same legal situation, which case has been this day decided by this court. (Wheatley v. Superior Court et al. [S.F. No. 13281 of the records of this court], ante, p. 722 [279 P. 989].)

For the reasons stated in the case last cited, the proceedings are affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Esaisa v. Superior Court of Sonoma County
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 31, 1929
Citation: 207 Cal. 796
Docket Number: Docket No. S.F. 13283.
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.