History
  • No items yet
midpage
Beilby v. Superior Court
1902 Cal. LEXIS 446
| Cal. | 1902
|
Check Treatment

Petition for certiorari, presenting the following case: Petitioner was plaintiff in an action appealed from justice's court to superior court. Upon a trial de novo there was a verdict for defendant. More than five days after the verdict, but within an extension of time granted by the trial judge, the defendant filed his cost-bill, the amount of which was included in his judgment. Petitioner claims that the judgment is to that extent void, because the trial judge *Page 52 had no power to extend the time for filing the cost-bill, and that, being too late, costs were waived.

We think, however, that the service and filing of a cost-bill is fairly within a proper construction of section 1054 of the Code of Civil Procedure authorizing extensions of time. It is substantially "a notice other than of appeal."

Writ denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Beilby v. Superior Court
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 10, 1902
Citation: 1902 Cal. LEXIS 446
Docket Number: S.F. No. 3413.
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.