History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bailley v. All Persons Etc.
1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 45
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1912
|
Check Treatment

The questions involved herein are the same as those in the case of Bagley v. Bloom et al. (No. 1041), ante, p. 255, [125 P. 931], decided this day, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, the judgment is affirmed.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on August 14, 1912.

Case Details

Case Name: Bailley v. All Persons Etc.
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jun 15, 1912
Citation: 1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 45
Docket Number: Civ. No. 1025.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.