History
  • No items yet
midpage
Skipitarey v. Fitts
17 P.2d 159
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1932
|
Check Treatment

[1] The respondents have made a motion to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that appellants' opening brief violates that portion of Rule *Page 192 VIII of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal requiring each point to be presented separately "under an appropriate heading, showing the nature of the question to be presented or the point to be made". There are but two headings or titles in the brief, the one "Statement of the Case" and the other "Argument". It is manifest that respondents' motion is well founded. (See Barnes v. Cocke, 99 Cal.App. 700 [279 P. 190], Hawkins v. Doolittle, 113 Cal.App. 619 [298 P. 862],Withers v. Southern Pac. Co., 101 Cal.App. 373 [281 P. 518], and People v. Yaroslawsky, 110 Cal.App. 175 [293 P. 815].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Skipitarey v. Fitts
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Dec 14, 1932
Citation: 17 P.2d 159
Docket Number: Docket No. 7222.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.