History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. City of Piedmont
100 Cal. App. 802
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1929
|
Check Treatment

From each of three declaratory judgments the defendant has appealed. [1] In each case the point is made that the trial court had no jurisdiction to determine the validity of Ordinance No. 268 of the City of Piedmont. On the authority of Andrews v.City of Piedmont (No. 6624), ante, p. 700 [281 P. 78], this day filed, the point may not be sustained. In the view we take of the record it is unnecessary to discuss either of the other two points made by the defendant.

Each of the judgments is affirmed.

Koford, P.J., and Nourse, J., concurred.

*Page 1

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. City of Piedmont
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Sep 24, 1929
Citation: 100 Cal. App. 802
Docket Number: Docket No. 6848.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.