History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Pimentel
37 Cal. App. 682
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1918
|
Check Treatment

The defendant was convicted of robbery, and from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial he brings this appeal.

No appearance in his behalf has been made in this court and we have been furnished with no statement of any reason for disturbing the verdict found against the defendant.

Of course, the presumption is that no prejudicial error was committed and that the verdict is amply supported. We may add that we have sufficiently examined the record to be convinced that the defendant was justly convicted.

The judgment and order are affirmed. *Page 683

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Pimentel
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jun 27, 1918
Citation: 37 Cal. App. 682
Docket Number: Crim. No. 438.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.