History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baldwin v. Walls
137 P. 1066
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1913
|
Check Treatment

The notice of appeal specifies that "plaintiff C. S. Baldwin, in the above entitled action, hereby appeals to the supreme court of said state of California, from the order of the superior court of said county of Modoc, sustaining *Page 350 defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's amended complaint in said action."

It is well settled that such order is not appealable. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 939; Agard v. Valencia, 39 Cal. 292; Ashley v.Olmstead, 54 Cal. 616; Hadsall v. Case, 15 Cal.App. 541, [115 P. 330].)

As stated in the Agard case: "The judgment is itself an adjudication upon the demurrer; and it is only from the judgment, and not from the order sustaining the demurrer, that the plaintiff could appeal."

The purported appeal must be dismissed and it is so ordered.

Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J. concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Baldwin v. Walls
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Nov 25, 1913
Citation: 137 P. 1066
Docket Number: Civ. No. 1141.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.