History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gill v. Pratt
110 Cal. App. 451
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1930
|
Check Treatment

This is a companion case to Stout v. Gill (ante, p. 445 [294 P. 446]), this day decided. In that action it was contended that certain deeds were forged, and not acknowledged by the grantor. [1] This is an action for damages brought against the notary public who had attached certificates of acknowledgment to those deeds, and against his surety, based upon the theory that said certificates of acknowledgment were false. The two cases were tried at the same time, and the court, having found, in the case of Stout v. Gill, that the deeds involved were genuine, entered judgment in favor of the defendants in this action. The plaintiffs have appealed, and the parties have stipulated that the decision herein shall correspond to the decision in the other case.

The judgment in Stout v. Gill having been affirmed, the judgment here appealed from it also affirmed.

Cary, P.J., and Marks, J., concurred.

A petition by appellants to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 9, 1931. *Page 452

Case Details

Case Name: Gill v. Pratt
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Dec 15, 1930
Citation: 110 Cal. App. 451
Docket Number: Docket No. 25.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.